Logo
File #: 19872-25    Version: 1
Type: Waiver/Varience Status: Agenda Ready (BCC)
File created: 2/26/2025 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission
On agenda: 3/12/2025 Final action:
Title: Case No. VAR-2025-0006: Will Gleason of Dekker Designs, Agent on behalf of Ocean Rock Capital Partners and Grand Mesa Partners, LLC, property owner, requests a variance from the Downtown Los Alamos Streetscape Standards along Central Avenue. This variance pertains to an approved hotel development located at 400 Trinity Drive, Los Alamos, NM. The property, designated as EA2 S, is situated within the Eastern Area 2 Subdivision and the Downtown Los Alamos (DTLA) Zone District.
Attachments: 1. A - Application Submittal, 2. B - Engineering, Public Works, Memorandum, 3. C - Public Notices, 4. D - Staff Report

Title

Case No. VAR-2025-0006: Will Gleason of Dekker Designs, Agent on behalf of Ocean Rock Capital Partners and Grand Mesa Partners, LLC, property owner, requests a variance from the Downtown Los Alamos Streetscape Standards along Central Avenue. This variance pertains to an approved hotel development located at 400 Trinity Drive, Los Alamos, NM. The property, designated as EA2 S, is situated within the Eastern Area 2 Subdivision and the Downtown Los Alamos (DTLA) Zone District.

Property Owners

Ocean Rock Capital Partners and Grand Mesa Partners, LLC.

Applicant

Will Gleason of Dekker Designs, Agent

Case Manager

Desirae J. Lujan

Section 16-74(g), Variance Decision Criteria

An application for a variance shall be approved if it meets all of the following criteria:

 

  a. The variance will not be contrary to the public safety, health, or welfare.

  b. The variance will not undermine the intent of this Code, the applicable zone district, other county adopted policies or plans, or violate the building code

  c. Granting of the variance will not cause an intrusion into any utility or other easement unless approved by the owner of the easement.

  d. The variance request is caused by unusual physical characteristic or a hardship inherent in the lot or lot improvements and the peculiarity or hardship has not been self-imposed.

  e. The variance will not create any significant adverse impacts on properties within the vicinity.

  f. Granting of the approved variance is the minimum necessary easing of the Code requirements making possible the reasonable use of the land, structure, or building.

Section 16-72(c)(3), Public Hearing Decisions

The hearing body making a final decision shall take any one of the following actions:

 

  1. Approve the application as presented if the proposal is in conformity with the criteria.

  2. Approve the application with conditions. In granting conditional approval, the hearing body making the final decision may only impose such conditions as are reasonably necessary to meet the approval criteria.

  3. Deny the application if the proposal is not in conformance with the decision criteria within division 3, Specific Development Procedures. Remand the application back to the recommending body for further proceedings.

Attachments

A - Application Submittal

B - Engineering, Public Works, Memorandum

C - Public Notices

D - Staff Report