Logo
File #: 13489-20    Version: 1
Type: Briefing/Report (Dept,BCC) - Action Requested Status: Council Business
File created: 10/22/2020 In control: County Council - Regular Session
On agenda: 11/10/2020 Final action: 11/10/2020
Title: Appeal of the Planning and Zoning Commission's Case SUP-2020-0014; A Request for Special Use Permit to conduct an in-home day care facility; and Case SUP-2020-0015; A request for Special Use Permit for home business to employ more than one non-family member at 113B La Senda Road.
Presenters: Ryan Foster
Indexes (Council Goals): * 2020 Council Goal - N/A
Attachments: 1. A - Special Use Permit Review Criteria, 2. B- Development Code Appeals 2008, 3. C- Legal Notice, 4. D Owner Notification, 100 yds, 5. E- 2nd Amended Record, APL-2020-0018
Title
Appeal of the Planning and Zoning Commission's Case SUP-2020-0014; A Request for Special Use Permit to conduct an in-home day care facility; and Case SUP-2020-0015; A request for Special Use Permit for home business to employ more than one non-family member at 113B La Senda Road.
Recommended Action
I move that Council find that the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission was in accordance with adopted County plans, policies and ordinances and that the facts on which the decision was based are supported by the record and that the decision was not arbitrary, capricious, or a manifest abuse of discretion. I further move that Council affirm the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission in Case No SUP-2020-0014 and Case SUP-2020-0015.

Or
I move that Council find that the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission was not in accordance with adopted County plans, policies and ordinances and that the facts upon which the decision was based are not supported by the record and that the decision was arbitrary or capricious or a manifest abuse of discretion. I further move that Council overturn the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission and deny the application in Case No. SUP-2020-0014 and Case SUP-2020-0015.
Or
I move that Council find that the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission was not based upon sufficient evidence that the decision was in accordance with adopted County plans, policies and ordinances nor was the decision supported by sufficient evidence in the record that the decision was not arbitrary, capricious, or a manifest abuse of discretion. I further move that Council remand Case No. SUP-2020-0014 and Case SUP-2020-0015 to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further development of the facts [specify which matters are to be reconsidered and the reasons for remand] and for Planning and Zoning to reconsider its decision.
And
I further move to authori...

Click here for full text