Logo
File #: 13518-20    Version: 1
Type: Construction Contract Status: Consent
File created: 11/2/2020 In control: Board of Public Utilities
On agenda: 11/18/2020 Final action:
Title: Award of Bid No. 21-05 for the Purpose of the Overlook Park Non-Potable Water Booster Station Replacement Project with RMCI, Inc. in the Amount of $1,562,500, plus Applicable Gross Receipts Tax.
Presenters: James Alarid
Indexes (Council Goals): DPU FY2022 - 1.0 Provide Safe and Reliable Utility Services
Attachments: 1. A - Project Description
Title

Award of Bid No. 21-05 for the Purpose of the Overlook Park Non-Potable Water Booster Station Replacement Project with RMCI, Inc. in the Amount of $1,562,500, plus Applicable Gross Receipts Tax.

Recommended Action

I move that the Board of Public Utilities approve the Award of Bid No. 21-05 for the Purpose of the Overlook Park Non-Potable Water Booster Station Replacement Project with RMCI, Inc. in the Amount of $1,562,500 and a contingency in the amount of $234,000, for a total of $1,796,500 plus Applicable Gross Receipts Tax and forward to Council for approval.

Staff Recommendation

Staff recommends that the Board approve as presented.

Body

The project will replace the existing Overlook Park Irrigation Booster station which has been in service since 1982 and is at the end of its functional life.  A detailed description is provided as Attachment A.

Two bids were received for the project.  $24,250 separated the two bids indicating that the prices received were a good representation of the project cost.  The primary funding source for the project are a Water Trust Board (WTB) award of $800,000 ($480,000 grant and $320,000 loan at 0% interest), and a county match of $120,000, for a total of $920,000.   In the fall of 2018 when the WTB application was prepared the project was estimated to cost approximately $1 million, based primarily estimates for similar booster station project costs in 2015.  The large overrun is attributed to the extent of the extensive earthwork required due to the existing soil conditions and high market costs for piping, stainless steel mechanical equipment and electrical equipment. 

In an attempt to lower the bid cost, the chief procurement officer reached out to the low bidder to attempt to negotiate a lower price on the project based on provisions in the procurement code.  This resulted in the contractor lowering their bid by $20,000.

Staff has evaluated the bids, opportunities to reduce scope and re-bid the p...

Click here for full text