Logo
File #: 15995-22    Version: 1
Type: Appeal Status: Public Hearing
File created: 5/31/2022 In control: County Council - Special Meeting
On agenda: 8/19/2022 Final action:
Title: CASE NO. APL-2020-0020. An appeal to the Los Alamos County Council of the Planning and Zoning Commission's revised Final Order approving applications, Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law in the matter of CASE No. SUP-2022-0020 Denise Matthews, dba Worms and Wildflowers Daycare, seeking Special Use Permit approval for a daycare facility to provide care, services, and supervision for a maximum of 12 children at her residence addressed as 113 B La Senda Rd., & CASE No. SUP-2022-0021 Denise Matthews, dba Worms and Wildflowers Daycare, seeking Special Use Permit approval for a Home Business, to employ more than one non-family member for a daycare facility to be located at 113 B LA SENDA RD. The property, LSA03024A, is within the La Senda Subdivision and zoned Residential-Agriculture (R-A).
Presenters: Paul Andrus; Sobia Sayeda
Attachments: 1. A - Special Use Permit Review Criteria, 2. B - Development Code Appeals 2008, 3. C - Legal Notice, 4. D - Owner Notification, 100 yds, 5. E - Amended Record, APL-2022-0020
Title
CASE NO. APL-2020-0020. An appeal to the Los Alamos County Council of the Planning and Zoning Commission's revised Final Order approving applications, Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law in the matter of CASE No. SUP-2022-0020 Denise Matthews, dba Worms and Wildflowers Daycare, seeking Special Use Permit approval for a daycare facility to provide care, services, and supervision for a maximum of 12 children at her residence addressed as 113 B La Senda Rd., & CASE No. SUP-2022-0021 Denise Matthews, dba Worms and Wildflowers Daycare, seeking Special Use Permit approval for a Home Business, to employ more than one non-family member for a daycare facility to be located at 113 B LA SENDA RD. The property, LSA03024A, is within the La Senda Subdivision and zoned Residential-Agriculture (R-A).
Recommended Action
I move that Council find that the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission was in accordance with adopted County plans, policies and ordinances and that the facts on which the decision was based are supported by the record and that the decision was not arbitrary, capricious, or a manifest abuse of discretion. I further move that Council affirm the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission in Case No SUP-2022-0020 and Case SUP-2022-0021.

Or

I move that Council find that the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission was not in accordance with adopted County plans, policies and ordinances and that the facts upon which the decision was based are not supported by the record and that the decision was arbitrary or capricious or a manifest abuse of discretion. I further move that Council overturn the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission and deny the application in Case No. SUP-2022-0020 and Case SUP-2022-0021.

Or

I move that Council find that the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission was not based upon suffici...

Click here for full text